Thank you for this excellent outline on how to evaluate study data. Given the high levels of interest and attention to this issue world-wide It is now time for a paper which presents a generalised model on how to identify flaws in the method, approach, and presentation of results of clinical trial data. I find myself asking "how did you arrive at these conclusions" ? Hopeful for more detail, while understanding that much of the 'misinformation' in narratives today arise out of a lack of appreciation how best to apply statistics techniques within a framework. One which might prove to be both self-validating and capable of revealing errors when they happen.
Thank you for this excellent outline on how to evaluate study data. Given the high levels of interest and attention to this issue world-wide It is now time for a paper which presents a generalised model on how to identify flaws in the method, approach, and presentation of results of clinical trial data. I find myself asking "how did you arrive at these conclusions" ? Hopeful for more detail, while understanding that much of the 'misinformation' in narratives today arise out of a lack of appreciation how best to apply statistics techniques within a framework. One which might prove to be both self-validating and capable of revealing errors when they happen.