Fact: The total number of COVID fatalities in the United States in the last 4 months is 500 times higher than the fatalities in Uttar Pradesh in the same period.
The WHO article doesn't mention ivermectin, they just say "medicine kit" instead. Each medicine kit contains: Ivermectin 12 mg x 10, vitamin D, vitamin C, multivitamin, zinc, Tylenol, doxycycline 100 mg x 10.
Somehow people claim a state that had HIGHER reporting/testing is underreporting in relation to a neighboring state with the same demographics, similar resources etc.
Impressive how you don't let the things you don't know get in your way of getting to the conclusion you want.
But it’s strange that of all the factors you use, and question, the one you take at 'face value' is the number of cases (hospitalizations, deaths, etc.), wide considered to be an under-count, possibly a factor of up to 10.
No it's proving the same thing over 144 studies already proved, ivermectin is highly effective from cellular studies to in vivo to population studies. We see the same consistent results. The only "maybe" is maybe you're an idiot to claim a state with far more testing and tracking "underreported" from a neighboring state with LESS tracking having a higher count.
All you have to say is, 'I trust the case numbers from Uttar Pradesh 100%' for me to know the validity of the rest of your argument.
Officially, India has had 42M. As I'm sure you know, Uttar Pradesh has a population of >200M, and Juan presented a study saying 'Sero-survey conducted at the end of June 2021 showed antibodies in 71% of Uttar Pradesh population', this would calculate to 132M cases. Is this 'sufficient' testing to you? Seems to me that the missed a lot...
Uttar Paradesh posted that they had almost 2M cases, not the >132M you would expect with 71% antibody rates.
And with more than 23K deaths, out of the 2M cases, you get a CFR of >1%. Seems pretty high for a young country like India, especially one using an 'effective treatment', like ivermectin.
Juan, definitely interesting stuff. There is a thesis that suggests it is "parasites" that IVM is helping and thus reducing morbidity from Sars-Cov-2. I don't buy it, because we have a good Observational study from Florida and many physician using it routinely in the west. Still, what say you?
The new theory that "Ivermectin may help covid-19 patients—but only those with worms" is totally wrong. There is a study supporting this idea. They based the analysis on the erroneous idea that Brazil is a country with a low prevalence of parasitic worms.
Juan, I just read your telegram post about Puerto Rico and their interest in Ivermectin. I have been advocating for its use there on private FB pages. Got banned from one consequently.. Ivermectin is not available over the counter in pill form, only animal grade. 2 doctors were being investigated for prescribing, one was from the states. I know of a pastor there in Vieques who told me he has some in store, I had shared FLCCC’s info with him. Dominican Republic has it available over the counter in pill form. I’m sure some people used them as a source. But my question is, where did you get the information about the “increased interest” in Ivermectin in PR? Sources? I’m not challenging you per se but interested. Thank you!
The going-the-last-mile article shows that the WHO not only observed the success of ivermectin but they helped with the distribution:
https://www.who.int/india/news/feature-stories/detail/uttar-pradesh-going-the-last-mile-to-stop-covid-19
The WHO article doesn't mention ivermectin, they just say "medicine kit" instead. Each medicine kit contains: Ivermectin 12 mg x 10, vitamin D, vitamin C, multivitamin, zinc, Tylenol, doxycycline 100 mg x 10.
Great article! This slams the door on the naysayers arguments.. also this article shows Uttar Pradesh had HIGHER testing than any other state, blowing out the argument that it was "underreported" https://www.news18.com/news/india/uttar-pradesh-sets-new-record-becomes-first-state-to-cross-7-5-crore-covid-tests-4199399.html
Somehow people claim a state that had HIGHER reporting/testing is underreporting in relation to a neighboring state with the same demographics, similar resources etc.
Imagine that!
And some people have calculated the Covid-19 deaths to be undercounted by a factor of between 10 and +300!! (https://article-14.com/post/untitled-60cf605395758)
wow, yeah that is pure propaganda. Most likely from (((them))) who seem to be orchestrating all the propaganda
Do you think that if you just call something 'propaganda' it will disappear?
Seems like a lot of words to say 'maybe'.
Impressive how you don't let the things you don't know get in your way of getting to the conclusion you want.
But it’s strange that of all the factors you use, and question, the one you take at 'face value' is the number of cases (hospitalizations, deaths, etc.), wide considered to be an under-count, possibly a factor of up to 10.
What a stupid argument, Uttar pradesh is the complete opposite, they have far more testing than all the other states https://www.news18.com/news/india/uttar-pradesh-sets-new-record-becomes-first-state-to-cross-7-5-crore-covid-tests-4199399.html
No it's proving the same thing over 144 studies already proved, ivermectin is highly effective from cellular studies to in vivo to population studies. We see the same consistent results. The only "maybe" is maybe you're an idiot to claim a state with far more testing and tracking "underreported" from a neighboring state with LESS tracking having a higher count.
All you have to say is, 'I trust the case numbers from Uttar Pradesh 100%' for me to know the validity of the rest of your argument.
Officially, India has had 42M. As I'm sure you know, Uttar Pradesh has a population of >200M, and Juan presented a study saying 'Sero-survey conducted at the end of June 2021 showed antibodies in 71% of Uttar Pradesh population', this would calculate to 132M cases. Is this 'sufficient' testing to you? Seems to me that the missed a lot...
Juan doesn't show any actual numbers of death, but Uttar Pradesh reported -37K excess deaths for 2020 and 48K for 2021 (up to Aug 2021), with 6.8K and 22.8K listed as Covid deaths (https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2021.08.04.21261604v2.full.pdf).
Uttar Paradesh posted that they had almost 2M cases, not the >132M you would expect with 71% antibody rates.
And with more than 23K deaths, out of the 2M cases, you get a CFR of >1%. Seems pretty high for a young country like India, especially one using an 'effective treatment', like ivermectin.
Juan, definitely interesting stuff. There is a thesis that suggests it is "parasites" that IVM is helping and thus reducing morbidity from Sars-Cov-2. I don't buy it, because we have a good Observational study from Florida and many physician using it routinely in the west. Still, what say you?
The new theory that "Ivermectin may help covid-19 patients—but only those with worms" is totally wrong. There is a study supporting this idea. They based the analysis on the erroneous idea that Brazil is a country with a low prevalence of parasitic worms.
Juan, I just read your telegram post about Puerto Rico and their interest in Ivermectin. I have been advocating for its use there on private FB pages. Got banned from one consequently.. Ivermectin is not available over the counter in pill form, only animal grade. 2 doctors were being investigated for prescribing, one was from the states. I know of a pastor there in Vieques who told me he has some in store, I had shared FLCCC’s info with him. Dominican Republic has it available over the counter in pill form. I’m sure some people used them as a source. But my question is, where did you get the information about the “increased interest” in Ivermectin in PR? Sources? I’m not challenging you per se but interested. Thank you!