My entire family suffered through covid these past two weeks. With the help of early treatment Ivermectin according to the FLCCC protocol we recovered from all major symptoms in ONE DAY. If this were a drug Pfizer or Merck was pushing it would be all over the news and any trials stopped immediately to begin mass distribution.
I assume the next study that will be attacked by critics is the massive Brazilian study of 220,517 subjects. 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality’ for those using ivermectin and a 67% reduction in hospitalizations.
I am not sure how relevant is that but I tried investigating to find any data on financial reports and possible third-party donors for that study. As you can find in Funding Statement "This study was sponsored by the Aguascalienes state health institute". So I go to the state institute home page, annual financial reports (link: https://www.issea.gob.mx/CuentasPubAnuales.html), the 2021 year report, and what I found is ridiculous:
a) The page 3, summary, WAS REDACTED - look at the director sign, it was poorly copy and pasted as an image, you can even select it (yes the sign rectangle can be selected!) in your pdf browser.
b) Compared with 2019 and 2020 raport is enormously big - 1283 pages compared to 450 and 60 in previous ones.
This alone looks like some kind of fraud and document size makes it almost impossible to track.
I do wonder if Gideon is shill.
My entire family suffered through covid these past two weeks. With the help of early treatment Ivermectin according to the FLCCC protocol we recovered from all major symptoms in ONE DAY. If this were a drug Pfizer or Merck was pushing it would be all over the news and any trials stopped immediately to begin mass distribution.
I assume the next study that will be attacked by critics is the massive Brazilian study of 220,517 subjects. 68% reduction in COVID-19 mortality’ for those using ivermectin and a 67% reduction in hospitalizations.
https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/twitter-suppresses-massive-study-showing-ivermectin-reducing-covid-mortality-by-68/
I am not sure how relevant is that but I tried investigating to find any data on financial reports and possible third-party donors for that study. As you can find in Funding Statement "This study was sponsored by the Aguascalienes state health institute". So I go to the state institute home page, annual financial reports (link: https://www.issea.gob.mx/CuentasPubAnuales.html), the 2021 year report, and what I found is ridiculous:
a) The page 3, summary, WAS REDACTED - look at the director sign, it was poorly copy and pasted as an image, you can even select it (yes the sign rectangle can be selected!) in your pdf browser.
b) Compared with 2019 and 2020 raport is enormously big - 1283 pages compared to 450 and 60 in previous ones.
This alone looks like some kind of fraud and document size makes it almost impossible to track.
(direct link: https://www.issea.gob.mx/Docs/Transparencia/Cuenta%20Publica/ISSEA_H.CONGRESO_CP2021.PDF.pdf)